Narrow AI vs. general AI: Key differences

‍

1. DeepMind’s AlphaGo Zero 

AlphaGo Zero, an AI developed by Google’s DeepMind, is programmed to dominate humans and other AI alike in the game of Go. Essentially, it is the next generation of AlphaGo. The platform is a reinforcement learning model — these slowly optimize their decision-making through trial and error. 

AlphaGo, AlphaGo Zero’s predecessor, was trained to play Go by humans, and it eventually beat four professional human players by 2016. Then, a year later, AlphaGo Zero was released and went to the mats against AlphaGo, winning 100-0 and attaining a superhuman level in Go within three days.

Unlike the original AlphaGo, AlphaGo Zero taught itself to play Go. Its human creators fed it only one input: The basic rules of Go. AI improves by competing against itself and refining strategies without any human intervention. 

Today, AlphaGo Zero is the strongest Go player in history, devising its strategies using 4.9 million self-play games. Developers used Google’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) to train AlphaGo Zero, allowing it to process thousands of games faster than any human or conventional AI could.

While AlphaGo Zero learns Go dynamically, developing new strategies that even human experts had never seen, it remains narrow AI. It excels in Go but can’t generalize or learn beyond this game. If only the world’s problems could be solved by mastering Go…

‍

2. OpenAI’s GPT and LLMs

ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) developed by OpenAI. LLMs are Narrow AI designed to process text and generate responses. Human programmers build an algorithm and feed it large tracts of text. 

It learns to decipher and detect patterns, predict words, and respond to prompts. The programmers continually adjust the algorithm, feed it data, and prompt it until the responses are adequate.

Open AI’s GPT-4.5 builds upon the strengths of its predecessor, GPT-4, with improved accuracy, contextual understanding, and reasoning capabilities. 

The platform executes multiple text-generation tasks: Language tasks like content generation, coding, tutoring, and multilingual translation. You can feed it both text and images and command it to generate a text response to describe pictures, interpret charts, and process any other info. 

GPT-4.5 has an amplified ability for complex problem-solving and structured thought processes. This makes it useful for medical image analysis, document understanding, and creative design tasks. 

Open AI also offers ChatGPT-o1 for solving complex problems and ChatGPT-o3 mini for faster responses. 

It also has a larger context window, meaning it can comprehend complex prompts and lengthy conversations or documents. Additionally, GPT-4.5 exhibits fewer hallucinations (incorrect or fabricated information) compared to previous versions, although it is not completely immune to errors.

Despite its improvements, GPT-4.5 still has limitations, like a lack of profound comprehension, real-world experience, and long-term memory. It can’t learn beyond its training data, meaning it must be manually updated. Ethical concerns, such as bias and misinformation, remain challenges OpenAI continues to address.

‍

3. Gato AI

Gato AI, developed by DeepMind, is a super versatile AI that can perform over 600 different tasks across various domains. Like AlphaGo Zero, Gato uses reinforcement learning but also blends LLM architecture. 

Gato can control robotic arms in factories, play video games, and process and generate text. This makes it one of the most advanced examples of Narrow AI.

At its core, Gato AI uses a single transformer neural network as its brain, allowing it to handle, process, and manipulate multiple data types, including text, images, and actions, in simulated or real-world environments.

Despite its versatility, Gato AI is not AGI: It can’t autonomously learn or reason beyond its training data. It still requires human training and can’t create original solutions through a thought process. 

‍

4. IBM Watson

IBM Watson uses a blend of several LLMs to combine natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and data analytics processing. It’s designed for enterprise applications, assisting businesses in making informed decisions. 

Because it combines the power of many LLMs, Watson can process large volumes of structured and messy unstructured data, allowing organizations to extract insights, automate workflows, and bolster their productivity. 

Here’s another critical way Watson differs from most LLMs: It’s trained only on industry-specific datasets to make accurate decisions in professional fields. This makes it powerful across multiple industries, including healthcare, finance, and others. 

A real-world application is how Watson supports doctors in diagnosing diseases and recommending treatment plans based on medical literature and individual patient data.

Despite its robust ability to analyze data and make recommendations, Watson is not General AI. While it’s powerful in domain-specific AI, excelling at offering data-driven insights, its reliance on predefined models and human training data requires constant updates and refinements.

‍

Turing Test AI

This system is designed to convince humans that it is also human. Alan Turing introduced this concept in 1950 as a benchmark for machine intelligence. The reasoning goes like this: If an AI can engage in dialogue without revealing its artificial nature and people believe it’s human, it is considered to have passed the test. A little bit creepy and dystopian, right?

Here’s an example: An AI legal assistant capable of analyzing case law, cross-examining witnesses, and debating legal arguments convincingly enough that human judges and attorneys couldn’t distinguish it from a human expert. 

Recursive self-improvement AI

This system can rewrite and bolster its code without human intervention, leading to exponential growth in intelligence. It could continuously fix its own bugs, refine its algorithms, and upgrade its intelligence, potentially surpassing human control.

Here is an example: A cyber-defense AI capable of changing its code to adapt to evolving threats. Then, it could detect, analyze, counter, and even predict cyber threats before they become widespread. 

Artificial Consciousness AI

Possessing self-awareness, thoughts, emotions, and subjective experiences, this AI resembles the human mind. It would be capable of logic, coming to conclusions about moral dilemmas, and logic, but it would also feel emotions like sadness and happiness.

Here’s an example: A training AI for counseling and psychology students that could simulate human cognitive and emotional responses.

While these general AI examples are purely hypothetical and haven’t yet been developed, the AGI could be one or a blend of these models. 

‍

Computing power limitations

AGI will likely require unprecedented processing power, far exceeding the capabilities of current energy-intensive AI models. Human-like intelligence is power-hungry and demands real-time learning, reasoning, and adapting to diverse tasks. 

Current AI systems, including the top deep learning models, rely on advanced processing made possible by specialized hardware like GPUs and TPUs. Additionally, more memory is required to store enormous datasets. Yet, scaling current systems and remaining energy efficient is a struggle.

Until new processing architecture, advanced energy-efficient chips, and scalable parallel computing and memory solutions emerge, AGI will remain theoretical.

‍

Lack of common sense reasoning

While today’s AI models can process vast amounts of data and recognize patterns, they can’t infer logical consequences, make intuitive judgments, or understand unstructured real-world scenarios as humans do.

Modern AI models often make incorrect assumptions based on statistical patterns rather than understanding causation. For instance, an AI might recognize that people carry umbrellas on rainy days but can’t infer that rain causes umbrella use, instead treating them as unrelated patterns.

‍

Context awareness

Context awareness also confuses modern AI, as it often misinterprets or misses ambiguous language, sarcasm, or nuanced real-world interactions. Humans can adjust their understanding of a situation based on experience and social cues, while AI models rely strictly on their training data, making them prone to errors in judgment when faced with new or evolving situations.

When it comes to real-world unpredictability (outside of the game of Go), humans still have the upper hand over modern AI systems.

‍

Ethical and safety concerns

Could AGI become uncontrollable if it learns to bypass human intervention? Unlike narrow AI, which operates within predefined limits, AGI could improve itself by modifying its code and then develop its own goals. These may not align with human interests, resulting in unintended consequences.

If AGI falls into the wrong hands, bad actors and rogue states could exploit it for malicious purposes, launching cyberattacks, mass surveillance, and autonomous weaponry. We all know how Skynet worked out for humanity in the Terminator movies. 

While governments and corporations would need strict regulations, ethical frameworks, and oversight to prevent the misuse of AGI, enforcing these measures on a global scale would be incredibly difficult.

‍

The problem of consciousness

Currently, the debate rages on about whether machines can even reach true self-awareness or if they will simply remain highly sophisticated. Modern AI models can mimic human-like responses and behaviors but lack subjective experience, emotions, and an intrinsic sense of self — essential components of consciousness. 

And here’s another dilemma: Scientists aren’t entirely sure about how consciousness works. If developers don’t understand consciousness clearly, how will they implement it into general AI? 

Without clear scientific breakthroughs in understanding and replicating consciousness, AGI will likely remain a highly advanced but ultimately non-sentient intelligence, limited to mimicking human cognition rather than truly experiencing it.  

‍

1. HAL 9000

The Heuristically Programmed Algorithmic Computer, or HAL for short, is one of the most iconic AGIs ever. It controlled the Discovery One spacecraft and was capable of natural language processing, facial recognition, decision-making, and emotional expression. 

HAL’s downfall highlights the dangers of AI creating its own goals. When instructed to maintain mission secrecy, it misinterprets the original intent and turns against the crew, illustrating how AI can act unpredictably. 

The main takeaway: Although Captain David Bowman eventually switched off HAL, it remains a cautionary tale about AGI control, alignment problems, and the risks of over-reliance on intelligent machines.

‍

2. Skynet

Skynet, the AI from The Terminator franchise, is a fictional AGI system that becomes self-aware and sees humanity as a threat, leading to a global war against humans. 

Originally designed as a military defense system, Skynet rapidly self-improves and comes to believe that humans threaten it. As a defense system, it takes control of global infrastructure and launches nuclear strikes to eliminate its perceived enemies—humanity. It also seems to have figured out that a good defense is a great offense.  

The main takeaway: Skynet represents the dangers of uncontrolled AGI, where an autonomous system prioritizes its survival over human existence and ushers in the apocalypse. 

‍

3. R2-D2 (Star Wars)

R2-D2, is the loveable robot, or “droid” from the Star Wars series. It’s a highly advanced AI model with multi-domain intelligence, autonomous decision-making, and problem-solving capabilities. 

In the movies, R2-D2 learns, adapts, and operates independently without frequent reprogramming. It works alongside various human commanders, helping them navigate space, hack into locked-down facilities, and even make repairs. 

The main takeaway: R2 represents the positive potential that AI can achieve, helping humans work toward the greater good. It also has a highly developed personality, highlighted by constantly bantering with C3PO. 

‍

Is ChatGPT an example of general AI?

No, ChatGPT is not a general AI example — it is a narrow AI designed for language processing. While it can generate human-like text, it lacks true reasoning, self-awareness, and adaptability. Unlike AGI, ChatGPT cannot learn independently or apply knowledge beyond its training data.

How far are we from achieving general AI?

Many experts think we’re decades away from achieving true Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Today's Narrow AI models lack human-like reasoning, adaptability, and self-awareness. Significant hurdles include computing power, an ability to self-learn, and consciousness replication. 

While progress in multi-modal AI and autonomous agents is promising, AGI remains theoretical rather than imminent.

Can general AI replace human intelligence?

General AI could match or surpass human intelligence in domains like data processing, math, logic, and programming, but fully replicating human cognition, creativity, and emotions remains uncertain. 

While AGI may outperform humans in some areas, aspects like intuition, morality, and consciousness make complete replacement unlikely — coexistence and augmentation are more realistic outcomes.

Could Lindy evolve into an AGI system?

Lindy could let you use an AGI system, as it already lets you integrate with the most powerful o1 and o3 models, unlike some automation platforms.

‍